Excellent question

From Deep-Sea News:

Why is it that we now condemn the man on the left but celebrate the dudes on the right? What is fundamentally different about these two photos?


I think it is because we can readily see the impact of killing a lion but the ecological effects of removing upper level pelagic predators are practically invisible to us. What do you think?

3 thoughts on “Excellent question

  1. Barbra & Jack Donachy

    We think this nonsense of killing these huge fish for a photo op – be it large halibut, billfish, tuna, sharks, grouper or other top predators – is going to increasingly become looked down upon. The practice is not sustainable, and a dead marlin of this size makes for a sorry picture indeed.

  2. Matt Bille

    I think the short version is that we can’t get away from two ideas. One is that the less the animal is like us, the more killing it for purely sporting reasons is OK. The second is that the image of the seas as self-renewing pools of unlimited resources just won’t die.

  3. Terry McGlynn

    I agree.
    That said, another distinction is that it’s socially acceptable to eat the one on the right, and not the one on the left. So the one on the left is seen to be a “waste” while the one on the right is just food to some people.
    Most people don’t look at animals and think about the critters’ trophic position, they classify as yummy or not yummy.


Leave a Reply to Terry McGlynn Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s